Annotation for unfolding wanted
Bulat Ziganshin
bulat.ziganshin at gmail.com
Tue Jul 31 06:18:36 EDT 2007
Hello Simon,
Tuesday, July 31, 2007, 1:22:14 PM, you wrote:
> GHC never inlines recursive functions. Why not? Because doing so
> exposes a new inline opportunity. How many times would you like it inlined? Not forever, I assume!
really, state of things in this area is not pleasant. making
polymorphic function recursive kills the performance because it's no
more inlined nor specialized - it may be called only with real
dictionary. because i'm wrote polymorphic i/o library, i had many
situations when in rare cases functions should call itself recursively
like this:
getChar = if bufferEmpty
then fillBuffer; getChar
else return *p++
(sorry for some pseudocode) and it was very inefficient. at the last
end, i was need to create special functions to handle recursive calls
and call it when buffer empty so that main function becomes
non-recursive:
getChar = if bufferEmpty
then getChar'
else return *p++
getChar' = fillBuffer; getChar
it will be great if specifying INLINE for recursive function will mean
that it should be inlined at least once and then call to
non-polymorphic specialized version should be made. at least it will
be ideal for code like this
--
Best regards,
Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list