*****SPAM***** Annotation for unfolding wanted
Seth Kurtzberg
seth at cql.com
Sun Jul 29 11:33:40 EDT 2007
Anybody know what spam detection program is producing this absurd result, so
I can make sure I never even think about using it? It's the second such
email in two (or possibly three) days.
The potential of Bayesian filtering is vastly overstated, but this one has
to be a bug or usage error of some sort.
-----Original Message-----
From: glasgow-haskell-users-bounces at haskell.org
[mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Georg
Martius
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 6:21 AM
To: glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
Subject: *****SPAM***** Annotation for unfolding wanted
Spam detection software, running on the system "h7568.serverkompetenz.net",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of
that system for details.
Content preview: Hi Tim, thanks for the hint, but I tried this without
success. My point is, that I don't want to try a pragma and see whether
it works. I would like to specify the requirement that a function has to
be in constant space and if it cannot be done, that the program should
not compile. Would it be complicated to include in the compiler? [...]
Content analysis details: (7.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
3.0 BAYES_95 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 95 to 99%
[score: 0.9674]
1.9 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
[87.172.161.188 listed in combined.njabl.org]
2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP
address
[87.172.161.188 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list