hrm...
John Meacham
john at repetae.net
Fri Jan 26 19:55:11 EST 2007
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:48:29AM +0100, Lemmih wrote:
> On 1/27/07, John Meacham <john at repetae.net> wrote:
> >so I have this simple bit of code, which should be fast but seems to be
> >being compiled to something very slow.
> >
> >> import Data.Word
> >> import Data.Bits
> >>
> >> fhb :: Word -> Word
> >> fhb w = b1 .|. b2 where
> >> b2 = if 0xFFFF0000 .&. w /= 0 then 0x2 else 0
> >> b1 = if 0xFF00FF00 .&. w /= 0 then 0x1 else 0
> >
> >what it compiles to is something involving Integers, lots of coercions
> >and other nasty stuff when it should consist of a couple of primitive
> >operations.
>
> Output from an AMD64 box:
>
> $wfhb =
> \ (ww_sIw :: GHC.Prim.Word#) ->
> case GHC.Prim.eqWord# (GHC.Prim.and# __word 4278255360 ww_sIw) __word 0
> of wild2_aHI {
> GHC.Base.False ->
> case GHC.Prim.eqWord# (GHC.Prim.and# __word 4294901760 ww_sIw)
> __word 0
> of wild21_XHW {
> GHC.Base.False -> __word 3; GHC.Base.True -> __word 1
> };
> GHC.Base.True ->
> case GHC.Prim.eqWord# (GHC.Prim.and# __word 4294901760 ww_sIw)
> __word 0
> of wild21_XHW {
> GHC.Base.False -> __word 2; GHC.Base.True -> __word 0
> }
> }
>
Yeah, but the 64 bit version of the algorithm also generates the bad
code on x86-64.
I think the issue is an off by one error somewhere, making ghc think that
0xffffffff is too big to fit in a Word, when it actually fits just
right.
John
--
John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list