ghc: out of memory error while compiling huge "let"

[Kirsten Chevalier]

On 1/12/07, David Morse <dcmorse at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is there some simple syntactic refactoring I can do to make this work?
>  E.g. busting the local bindings out of the "let" and into to the
> global level?
>
> The bindings are intertwined, but I could (with some effort) reorder
> them so that b5000 would only reference b5001...b10000 and never
> b1...b4999.

Somehow I doubt that the answer is going to be that simple, but for
starters, what's your ghc command line? (In particular, are you
compiling with -O or not? If ghc is eating that much memory than I'd
assume you are, but one should never assume.)

Cheers,
Kirsten

-- 
Kirsten Chevalier* chevalier at alum.wellesley.edu *Often in error, never in doubt
"by God I *KNOW* what this network is for, and you can't have it."--Russ
Allbery