Adding type signature changes semantics (was [Haskell-cafe] Lazy in either argument?)

Bulat Ziganshin bulat.ziganshin at
Sat Aug 4 00:31:23 EDT 2007

Hello Isaac,

Saturday, August 4, 2007, 4:01:18 AM, you wrote:

> Inserting a preemption test in non-allocating loops seems like a good
> idea to me (I hate the invisible threat that my program might not thread
> as threading should work)... any idea how bad the performance impact 
> could be

with loop unrolling it can be made smaller than any predefined value

Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at

More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list