Ross Paterson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:53:55PM +0000, Simon Marlow wrote: > >>Incedentally, this is also one reason I think lazy I/O is a wart (despite >>its obvious usefulness): because it necessarily requires talking about >>evaluation order. > > > What is lazy output? Buffering? Well ok, "lazy I" then :-) Cheers, Simon