Unregisterised GHC 6.4.2 on the ARM success -- now what?
Simon Marlow
simonmarhaskell at gmail.com
Fri May 5 05:11:07 EDT 2006
Jeremy Shaw wrote:
> At Wed, 03 May 2006 22:06:05 -0700,
> Jeremy Shaw wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I believe I have successfully got an unregisterised version of ghc
>>6.4.2 compiled for arm/linux.
>
>
> Updates:
> -------
>
> 1) I turns out I only had a in-place build of ghc, I have now got a
> real build 'working'.
>
> 2) I have started putting my notes in the Wiki
>
> I added a section to the end of this page:
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Platforms
>
> And started this page:
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ArmLinuxGhc
>
> I will add the information about getting from an inplace .hc build to
> a normal build tomorrow.
>
> 3) It would appear that the floating point problem is still a
> problem. It did not cause any compile time errors. But ghc
> generates bogus answers, the one liner:
>
> main = print 1.0
>
> prints: 5.299808824e-315
If you want to get a picture of how much of your GHC build is working,
it's useful to run the test suite. Check out the testsuite repository
from darcs.haskell.org into your source tree, then
$ cd testsuite
$ make boot
$ cd tests/ghc-regress
then, to do a quick test run (~5 minutes):
$ make stage=2 fast
or a full test run (several hours, probably):
$ make stage=2
Cheers,
Simon
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list