Building NewBinary with ghc 6.5

[Joel Reymont]

Close but no cigar!

sudo runhaskell Setup.lhs install -v5
directory dist/doc/html does exist: False
Installing: /usr/local/lib/NewBinary-0.1/ghc-6.5 & /usr/local/bin  
NewBinary-0.1...
copy dist/build/NewBinary/FastMutInt.hi to /usr/local/lib/ 
NewBinary-0.1/ghc-6.5/NewBinary/FastMutInt.hi
copy dist/build/NewBinary/Binary.hi to /usr/local/lib/NewBinary-0.1/ 
ghc-6.5/NewBinary/Binary.hi
copy dist/build/libHSNewBinary-0.1.a to /usr/local/lib/NewBinary-0.1/ 
ghc-6.5/libHSNewBinary-0.1.a
copy dist/build/HSNewBinary-0.1.o to /usr/local/lib/NewBinary-0.1/ 
ghc-6.5/HSNewBinary-0.1.o
/usr/bin/ranlib /usr/local/lib/NewBinary-0.1/ghc-6.5/ 
libHSNewBinary-0.1.a
Registering NewBinary-0.1...
Reading package info from ".installed-pkg-config" ... done.
ghc-pkg: invalid package identifier:

It's not showing me the ghc-pkg that's being invoked.

On Jul 26, 2006, at 12:56 AM, Jeremy Shaw wrote:

> At Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:40:33 +0100,
> Joel Reymont wrote:
>>
>> Is there something that looks particularly wrong below?
>
> Can you try the install with verbosity turned up:
>
>    $ sudo runhaskell Setup.lhs install -v
>
> or perhaps even
>
>    $ sudo runhaskell Setup.lhs install -v5
>
> I believe this will show the actually invocation of ghc-pkg that is
> being used. You can then try running ghc-pkg by hand and see if it
> gives you the same result.
>
> That should at least yield some useful data.
>
> Thanks.
> j.

--
http://wagerlabs.com/