-fasm vs. -fvia-c
joelr1 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 25 09:29:28 EDT 2006
On Jul 25, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> You can also cut compile times by compiling fewer non-core
> libraries and
> by using -fasm rather than -fvia-C.
I heard recently that GHC does not generate code that gcc likes and
so there's a push to improve asm generation. What stage is that push at?
Do I cripple my GHC build in any way by using asm as opposed to via-c?
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users