[Haskell-cafe] Re: Packages and modules

Niklas Broberg niklas.broberg at gmail.com
Wed Jul 5 08:42:31 EDT 2006

> So here are some options:
>    1. the proposal as it is now, keeping exposed/hidden state in the
>       package database, don't support "available"
>    2. Add support for "available".  Cons: yet more complexity!
>    3. Drop the notion of exposed/hidden, all packages are "available".
>       (except for base?).  Cons: lots more typing, very
>       non-backwards-compatible, still have to list dependencies in
>       .cabal files.
> anyone have any more suggestions?  Is there any way to simplify?  I
> rather feel this design is getting a little unwieldy.

Maybe a dumb question, but why not support only exposed and available?
Why have hidden modules that cannot be used, even when the programmer
explicitly asks for them?


More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list