Announcing regex-tre-0.66 and benchmarks

[skaller]

On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 11:32 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:

> So I still don't understand why PCRE should be 40 times faster than PosixRE. 
> Surely this can't be just due to differences in the underlying C library?

Read Ville's papers. Includes comparisons of GNU regex 
and PCRE.

-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net