benchmarking 6.4 vs 5.02.3
Serge D. Mechveliani
mechvel at botik.ru
Fri Jun 10 10:17:52 EDT 2005
I wrote about ghc-5.02.1 taking 13 times less memory than
ghc-6.4 to compute a certain example like merge-sort.
Now, I compare ghc-5.02.3 and ghc-6.4 on the same machine.
The needed time and memory occur the same all right.
The resources grow almost as O(n*log(n)), as expected.
My error was that it was -H used for 5.03 instead of -M.
With -M, they need the same time and space.
Sorry for confusion.
-----------------
Serge Mechveliani
mechvel at botik.ru
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list