Set, Map libraries
john at repetae.net
Thu Jun 2 17:11:08 EDT 2005
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:03:26PM -0400, S. Alexander Jacobson wrote:
> Any reason the libaries don't define:
> class HasNull a where null::a->Bool
> class HasEmpty a where empty::a
> I find that I sometimes switch between using lists, sets, or tables as
> my collection type and the forced import qualifification for generic
> collection operations seems annoying.
HasEmpty should be a superclass of Monoid. I have wanted that split out
on various occasions.
John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users