GHC-problem with parsing infix type synonyms - bug?
simonpj at microsoft.com
Wed Feb 23 08:48:11 EST 2005
OK, done. I've documented infix classes too.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: glasgow-haskell-users-bounces at haskell.org
| bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Johan Glimming
| Sent: 17 February 2005 10:04
| To: <glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org>
<glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org>; Simon Marlow
| Subject: Re: GHC-problem with parsing infix type synonyms - bug?
| > I think the syntax used in your type synonym declaration isn't
| > supported
| > at the moment. For consistency it probably should be.
| Is there any chance to fix this in the next 6.4 release, or can I
| 6.4 myself? (I'd need hints though.) I have some code in a project for
| which I want to use type synonyms for instead of data type
| to save on all the constructor names hanging around.
| Johan Glimming.
| Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
| Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users