[Haskell-cafe] Re: Double -> CDouble, realToFrac doesn't work
iakd0 at clusterf.urz.uni-halle.de
Fri Nov 5 08:57:46 EST 2004
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Robert Dockins wrote:
> What IEEE has done is shoehorned in some values that aren't really
> numbers into their representation (NaN certainly; one could make a
> convincing argument that +Inf and -Inf aren't numbers).
I wonder why Infinity has a sign in IEEE floating processing, as well as
0. To support this behaviour uniformly one would need a +0 or -0 offset
for each number, which would lead straightforward to non-standard analysis
Thus (a-b) is not the same as -(b-a) for IEEE floats!
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users