Malcolm.Wallace at cs.york.ac.uk
Thu Mar 18 10:36:21 EST 2004
"Simon Peyton-Jones" <simonpj at microsoft.com> writes:
> | > I am currently evaluating different languages for implementing an
> | > application which will have to manipulate large graphs representing
> | > the structure of programs and their evolution.
> | > Speed is in fact a crucial criterium for the language choice.
> My biased impression is that raw speed is seldom the determining factor in
> language choice.
Indeed. And I would add that, if the application's algorithms turn out
to be sufficiently lazy, then using Haskell /could/ end up being /more/
space-efficient than alternative languages, which would be a big win
if the data-structures being manipulated are very large.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users