ketil+haskell at ii.uib.no
Thu Dec 16 02:44:06 EST 2004
Kenny Chamber <kenny at gem-hs.org> writes:
> How long after posting should it take for a message to appear on the
It should be pretty fast, but some lists moderate posts by
non-subscribers. Could this be your problem?
For timing, we could look at your headers:
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 07:33:39 +0300
From: Kenny Chamber <kenny at gem-hs.org>
You sent it today, at 07:33:39 +0300 (4:33 UTC). Early bird, huh?
Received: from [220.127.116.11] (spb-195-190-104-65.sovintel.ru
[18.104.22.168] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail2.hqhost.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBG4Xgt8098072
for <glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:33:44 GMT
5 seconds later, it is at mail2.hqhost.net, presumably your outgoing
Received: from mail2.hqhost.net (mail2.hqhost.net [22.214.171.124])
by www.haskell.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD51368816
for <glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org>;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:21:54 -0500 (EST)
www.haskell.org gets it the day before, but is on the American east
coast. I make it 4:21 UTC, though, so one of you isn't running NTP
like he or she should.
Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 05:33:52 +0100
I don't know who adds this.
Received: from haskell.cs.yale.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by www.haskell.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 50D48368835; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:21:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from bugs.haskell.org ([126.96.36.199]:53008 helo=www.haskell.org)
(So - what's *really* the name of this computer?)
by eik.ii.uib.no with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
for ketil+haskell at ii.uib.no; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 05:33:51 +0100
Ends up in my inbox at 05:33:51, subtract one hour if you want UTC.
The full trip done in twelwe seconds. If we trust the timestamps to
have that good resolution.
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users