simonmar at microsoft.com
Thu Aug 12 06:54:59 EDT 2004
On 11 August 2004 18:24, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
> "Jon Fairbairn" <Jon.Fairbairn at cl.cam.ac.uk> writes:
>>  What's the "Do" doing there anyway? You end up writing
>> withSocketsDo$do, and we could do without the Do$do.
> Yes, that just doesn't fly, does it? withSocketsDo in user
> code became superfluous a couple of releases back.
Interesting. Why is it superfluous? Should it be made a no-op?
Shouldn't we at least document that it isn't required any more?
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users