A simple doubt about // operator ....
ajb at spamcop.net
ajb at spamcop.net
Sun Nov 2 20:02:15 EST 2003
G'day all.
Quoting Hal Daume III <hdaume at ISI.EDU>:
> In general, I think the name "array" for these data structures is a bit
> misleading, since nearly everyone expects an array to have constant time
> read and update, while these only have constant time read.
It's no worse than "record" in this respect. Wouldn't everyone expect a
field update to be constant time, not linear in the number of fields?
Cheers,
Andrew Bromage
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list