@-bindings broken in 6.0?

[Manuel M T Chakravarty]

"Simon Peyton-Jones" <simonpj@microsoft.com> wrote,

> There's support for more fine-grained distinctions now.  We hav
> 	-fffi
> 	-fglasgow-exts
> 	-farrows
> 	-fparr		(Manuel's parallel array stuff)
> 
> We could add
> 	-fth
> 
> (or -fTH?) if that seemed better

I think, -fth would be a good idea.  (I'd go for lower case,
for consistency with -fffi.)

Manuel

> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: Ralf Hinze [mailto:ralf@informatik.uni-bonn.de]
> | Sent: 24 June 2003 13:42
> | To: Ketil Z. Malde; Simon Peyton-Jones
> | Cc: John Meacham; glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
> | Subject: Re: @-bindings broken in 6.0?
> | 
> | > I think lumping all these extensions under one switch is the
> | > problem.
> | 
> | Yep, I agree. Would it be hard to split `-fglasgow-exts'
> | up? I'd greatly appreciate a more fine-grained control
> | here.
> | 
> | Cheers, Ralf
> | 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users