Thu, 17 Apr 2003 12:02:57 +0100
> > Does anyone have any opinions on this topic? It's a small=20
> point, but
> > one that bites quite frequently. It might even be possible=20
> to arrange
> > that 'forall' and 'exists' were only keywords in types, and not in
> > terms, but I'm not sure it's worth the bother.
> 'forall' is already a special keyword that only applies=20
> inside types, in both Hugs and GHC.
Oops, I lie. Not in Hugs, only in GHC.