re-opening a closed stdin?
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:34:07 +0100
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:09:01AM -0000, Simon Marlow wrote:
> It is nice, but it introduces too many problems. What happens to any
> I/O errors encountered by the lazy I/O? They have to be discarded,
> which means you can't effectively use lazy I/O for robust applications
*mumble*Exceptions*mumble*, but that of course opens another can of worms...
Maybe something similar to exceptions, but better suited to laziness...
p.s.: [x] Lazy I/O must die, just for the record. :)