[GHC] #5141: syntax error in pretty-printed kind ascriptions
GHC
cvs-ghc at haskell.org
Wed Apr 20 13:30:26 CEST 2011
#5141: syntax error in pretty-printed kind ascriptions
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
Reporter: megacz | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 7.0.3
Resolution: fixed | Keywords:
Testcase: | Blockedby:
Difficulty: | Os: Unknown/Multiple
Blocking: | Architecture: Unknown/Multiple
Failure: Incorrect warning at compile-time |
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
Changes (by simonpj):
* status: patch => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
Thanks; I've commmited your change.
Note, though, that it's likely that we're considering making operators
like '*' into type ''constructors'' rather that type ''variables'. This
is inconsitent with terms, but is jolly convenient:
{{{
data a + b = Left a | Right b
}}}
Of course there'll be a flag. But let us know if you think that having
operators be type variables is very useful. (I tend to think it's more
confusing than useful.)
Simon
--
Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5141#comment:2>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-bugs
mailing list