seg-fault in 6.10.1
Ian Lynagh
igloo at earth.li
Sat Jan 24 16:09:15 EST 2009
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 01:15:40AM +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>
> | Segmentation fault.
> |
> | Then, I noted that in a few places the compiler warned about skipping
> | some class member implementations in some instances.
> | I added these implementations, and now it works correct.
>
> If you aren't using the FFI or unsafe things, you should not get a seg fault.
It's possible it's a C stack overflow caused by cyclic default method
definitions. But worth checking, anyway.
Thanks
Ian
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-bugs
mailing list