[ ghc-Bugs-1194393 ] segmentation fault
SourceForge.net
noreply at sourceforge.net
Tue Nov 29 08:33:24 EST 2005
Bugs item #1194393, was opened at 2005-05-03 11:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zooko
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1194393&group_id=8032
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Zooko O'Whielacronx (zooko)
Assigned to: Simon Marlow (simonmar)
Summary: segmentation fault
Initial Comment:
http://bugs.darcs.net//Ticket/Display.html?id=367
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Zooko O'Whielacronx (zooko)
Date: 2005-11-29 13:33
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=52562
to reproduce:
1. Download
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/jboss/jboss-4.0.3SP1.tar.bz2?download
2. Untar it
3. darcs initialize
4. darcs record -al -m foo
Expected behavior: darcs records a massive patch adding all
of the contents to the repo.
Actual behavior: on Linux and Mac OS X darcs works as
expected. On Windows it gives an error. I believe the
error varies. radekg reported this: http://bugs.darcs.net/msg20
I tried darcs 1.0.4. and got some uninformative error
message generated by darcs. Then I tried darcs 1.0.3 and
got this:
darcs.exe: internal error: stg_ap_v_ret
Please report this as a bug to
glasgow-haskell-bugs at haskell.org,
or http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/ghc/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Zooko O'Whielacronx (zooko)
Date: 2005-11-28 15:52
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=52562
Hooray! A repeatable test case has been found!
http://bugs.darcs.net/issue8
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Simon Marlow (simonmar)
Date: 2005-09-23 10:19
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=48280
Without a repeatable test case, there's nothing we can do
with this bug report, sorry. If it reappears, feel free to
post more information and we can re-open the bug.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Zooko O'Whielacronx (zooko)
Date: 2005-06-10 15:00
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=52562
For what it is worth, I haven't gotten any of these errors
since I stopped trying to use darcs on lots of large binary
patches containing 100's of MB per patch.
So I suspect the bug is triggered by certain memory usage
patterns...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Simon Marlow (simonmar)
Date: 2005-05-03 15:07
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=48280
If the darcs devs can confirm that this is most likely a bug
in GHC, as opposed to a bug in darcs due to use of FFI or
unsafeWhatNot, then we'll look into it. We need a repro
case (the repository that caused the failure, at least), and
the same darcs sources.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1194393&group_id=8032
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-bugs
mailing list