On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 05:27:43PM -0000, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> '(' exp(i+1) op(a,i) ')'
> '(' op(a,i) exp(i+1) ')'
>
> '(' lexp(i) op(l,i) ')'
> '(' op(r,i) rexp(i) ')'
>
> And for the sake of fewer ambiguities, replace each op(a,i) with op(n,i)
> in the existing two section productions.
(+ 5) would not then be valid.
Ian