[GHC] #16411: Inconsistent -Wpartial-fields warnings with (~) vs. (~~)
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Sat Mar 9 00:00:45 UTC 2019
#16411: Inconsistent -Wpartial-fields warnings with (~) vs. (~~)
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: RyanGlScott | Owner: (none)
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 8.6.4
Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple
Architecture: | Type of failure: Incorrect
Unknown/Multiple | error/warning at compile-time
Test Case: | Blocked By:
Blocking: | Related Tickets:
Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
In this program:
{{{#!hs
{-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators #-}
{-# OPTIONS_GHC -Wpartial-fields #-}
module Bug where
import Data.Type.Equality
data T1 z where
MkT1a :: { rec1 :: () } -> T1 Int
MkT1b :: (z ~ Bool) => T1 z
data T2 z where
MkT2a :: { rec2 :: () } -> T2 Int
MkT2b :: (z ~~ Bool) => T2 z
}}}
I get no `-Wpartial-fields`–related warnings for `rec1`, but I do for
`rec2`:
{{{
GHCi, version 8.6.4: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Loaded GHCi configuration from /home/rgscott/.ghci
[1 of 1] Compiling Bug ( Bug.hs, interpreted )
Bug.hs:13:14: warning: [-Wpartial-fields]
Use of partial record field selector: ‘rec2’
|
13 | MkT2a :: { rec2 :: () } -> T2 Int
| ^^^^
}}}
This feels strangely inconsistent, since if GHC doesn't warn for `rec1`,
which uses `(~)`, then I feel like it shouldn't warn for `rec2` either, as
the only difference is that the surrounding constructor uses a slightly
different equality constraint `(~~)`.
The reason this happens is because the `dataConCannotMatch` function has
special reasoning for `(~)`, but not `(~~)`. Patch incoming.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/16411>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list