[GHC] #16344: GHC infers over-polymorphic kinds
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Thu Feb 21 14:14:31 UTC 2019
#16344: GHC infers over-polymorphic kinds
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: simonpj | Owner: (none)
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 8.6.3
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by goldfire):
Simon has proposed a fix:
In TcHsType, we find this, under `kcLHsQTyVars_NonCusk`:
{{{#!hs
mk_tc_binder :: LHsTyVarBndr GhcRn -> TyVar -> TyConBinder
-- See Note [Dependent LHsQTyVars]
mk_tc_binder hs_tv tv
| hsLTyVarName hs_tv `elemNameSet` dep_names
= mkNamedTyConBinder Required tv
| otherwise
= mkAnonTyConBinder tv
}}}
Simon suggests that changing it to this fixes the bug:
{{{#!hs
mk_tc_binder :: LHsTyVarBndr GhcRn -> TyVar -> TyConBinder
mk_tc_binder hs_tv tv
= mkAnonTyConBinder tv
}}}
Note: just deleting code!
Indeed, this change fixes the example in the ticket because it effectively
forgets that the first argument to `T` and the kind of the second are
related. The program above is rejected right in the `kc` pass, because GHC
tries to unify `ka` (a `TyVarTv`) with `Type` when looking at `Int` (never
mind the `Maybe` it will see soon). Some examples are rejected in the `tc`
pass though, like this:
{{{#!hs
data T2 ka (a::ka) = MkT2 (T2 Type a)
}}}
All fine during `kc`, but then once we produce `T2 :: forall ka -> ka ->
Type`, failure in `tc`. While I'm never comfortable with non-CUSK types
being rejected in the `tc` pass, I suppose it's OK.
More problematically, this is never rejected at all:
{{{#!hs
data T3 ka (a::ka) = forall b. MkT3 (T3 Type b)
}}}
This is accepted outright. The `kc` pass assigns kind `ka` to `b` (fine)
and then the `tc` pass instantiates `ka` to be `Type` and assigns kind
`Type` to `b`. Also fine (it's type-correct), but `T3` is polymorphically
recursive, and should be rejected.
So, I claim that Simon's fix makes these examples (erroneously accepted
polymorphic recursion) harder to find, but doesn't get rid of them all.
Instead, a more involved fix would be to, for example, require that all of
these types are immediately followed by `ka` at recursive occurrences --
anything other than a first argument of `ka` is rejected. I'm not sure how
to achieve this elegantly (haven't thought about it), but that should
stamp out the problem.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/16344#comment:3>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list