[GHC] #1965: Allow unconstrained existential contexts in newtypes
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Mon Sep 3 14:14:06 UTC 2018
#1965: Allow unconstrained existential contexts in newtypes
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: guest | Owner: (none)
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 6.8.1
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by sgraf):
Note that `data A = A !Int` and `newtype A = A Int` have subtly different
surface language semantics when they're pattern matched on. What would
`case undefined of A _ -> 1` evaluate to? For newtypes, it's `1` whereas
for strict data types this would blow up.
I guess what I'm saying is: The suggested lowering must preserve `data`
semantics and can never behave the same as actual `newtype`s.
Semantically, `data` is `data` and `newtype` is `newtype`. It would get
rid of the performance implications, though.
See this reddit thread for a longer discussion:
https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/6xri4d/whats_the_difference_between_newtype_type_and_data/dmi19pd
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1965#comment:38>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list