[GHC] #14068: Loopification using join points
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Thu Mar 22 14:33:30 UTC 2018
#14068: Loopification using join points
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nomeata | Owner: nomeata
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1
Resolution: | Keywords: JoinPoints
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: #13966 #14067 | Differential Rev(s): Phab:D3811
#14827 |
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nomeata):
More data. #14951 fixes some regressions that loopification introduces:
{{{
name previous change now
nofib/allocs/last-piece 642047800 - 11.08% 570920968 bytes
nofib/allocs/x2n1 697240 - 45.89% 377272 bytes
}}}
But it does not fix all the regressions that can be fixed by running
!SpecConstr twice (with simplification in between):
{{{
Benchmark previous change now
nofib/allocs/constraints 20491632 - 3.63% 19747392 bytes
nofib/allocs/event 129682800 + 8.44% 140626888 bytes
nofib/allocs/fulsom 243329208 - 7.83% 224287496 bytes
nofib/allocs/integer 40633632 - 3.06% 39389560 bytes
nofib/allocs/last-piece 642047800 - 11.49% 568297080 bytes
nofib/allocs/mandel2 1649568 - 26.78% 1207888 bytes
nofib/allocs/minimax 5371584 - 8.73% 4902576 bytes
nofib/allocs/parstof 3023208 - 3.7% 2911384 bytes
nofib/allocs/x2n1 697240 - 45.89% 377272 bytes
}}}
Which raises the question: Should we just go the easy route and run
!SpecConstr twice? (I
am measuring the effect of that on master, independent of loopification,
in branch `wip/T14951-blunt`.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14068#comment:47>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list