[GHC] #14068: Loopification using join points
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Fri Feb 23 13:40:59 UTC 2018
#14068: Loopification using join points
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nomeata | Owner: nomeata
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1
Resolution: | Keywords: JoinPoints
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: #13966 #14067 | Differential Rev(s): Phab:D3811
#14827 |
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nomeata):
> So why is this worse than the previous version?
Because if `drop` itself is in an inner loop, something like `map (\n ->
drop n xs) [0..1000]`, then we have to allocate a box for the the `I#` to
wrap the argument.
Previously, `drop` would have a specialization rule, and the calls to
`drop` would be replaced by a call to `$sdrop`.
_But_: Maybe we should simply not worry: For x2n1, allocation goes up by
80%, but the instruction count stays the same (+0.05%). I guess that the
extra `I#` constructor needed to allocate is consumed pretty quickly, and
never GC’ed…
_But again_: This line of reasoning doesn’t cut it for other benchmarks.
For example `treejoin`’s allocation goes up by 27%, and the instruction
count by 72%(!). With `-f-no-spec-constr`, there is no difference in
either number.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14068#comment:36>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list