[GHC] #16072: All dependencies of packages must be explicitly listed when defining flavour packages
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Wed Dec 19 23:31:59 UTC 2018
#16072: All dependencies of packages must be explicitly listed when defining
flavour packages
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mpickering | Owner: (none)
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Build System | Version: 8.6.3
(Hadrian) |
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by snowleopard):
I agree that having a more intelligent `packages` setting would be
convenient, although I'm not sure what would be the best way forward.
> It is also unclear to me why this function is defined recursively as
surely when we `need` one dependency, that will in turn `need` its
dependencies and so on.
This function doesn't `need` anything, it's purpose is to compute the list
of transitive dependencies of a `Context`. I believe one of the call sites
of this function does rely on transitive dependencies being included into
the result, although I'm afraid I don't recall right now where exactly
this call site is. It might have something to do with package
registration/configuration.
How is the current recursive definition problematic, apart from
complexity? I don't think this is immediately relevant to this issue.
> It would be much more robust for this check to be moved to the place
where `win32` is built.
What do you mean? There is no one place where `win32` is built: several
different build rules are involved in building `win32`, as any other
package.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/16072#comment:2>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list