[GHC] #15493: Elide empty dictionaries
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Thu Aug 9 01:52:28 UTC 2018
#15493: Elide empty dictionaries
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mnoonan | Owner: (none)
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.6.1
Component: Compiler | Version: 8.4.3
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by mnoonan:
Old description:
> Suppose you define a type class `C` with no methods, and use it as a
> constraint on a function `f :: C => Foo`. GHC's generated Core for `f`
> currently passes an empty dictionary for `C`. With optimizations, it
> seems to be true that at use sites, calls to `f` will be replaced with
> calls to an inner function that skips the typeclass dictionary. But can I
> count on this optimization always working?
>
> Would it possible to get a guarantee that the `C =>` constraint will have
> no run-time overhead, by dropping it entirely from the generated Core? Or
> is there a subtlety that prevents this from being sound?
>
> For context, I would like to implicitly pass compile-time evidence that
> various properties hold (e.g. such-and-such a list is non-empty), while
> retaining a guarantee that the evidence will have no run-time cost. Like
> this:
>
> {{{
> newtype Named a name = Named a
>
> class Fact p
>
> -- Ideally, we'd have a guarantee that the following function
> -- compiles to exactly the same code as `Prelude.head`
> head :: Fact (IsCons xs) => (a `Named` xs) -> a
> head xs = Prelude.head (coerce xs)
> }}}
New description:
Suppose you define a type class `C` with no methods, and use it as a
constraint on a function `f :: C => Foo`. GHC's generated Core for `f`
currently passes an empty dictionary for `C`. With optimizations, it seems
to be true that at use sites, calls to `f` will be replaced with calls to
an inner function that skips the typeclass dictionary. But can I count on
this optimization always working?
Would it possible to get a guarantee that the `C =>` constraint will have
no run-time overhead, by dropping it entirely from the generated Core? Or
is there a subtlety that prevents this from being sound?
For context, I would like to implicitly pass compile-time evidence that
various properties hold (e.g. such-and-such a list is non-empty), while
retaining a guarantee that the evidence will have no run-time cost. Like
this:
{{{
newtype Named a name = Named a
class Fact p
-- Ideally, we'd have a guarantee that the following function
-- compiles to exactly the same code as `Prelude.head`
head :: Fact (IsCons xs) => ([a] `Named` xs) -> a
head xs = Prelude.head (coerce xs)
}}}
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/15493#comment:1>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list