[GHC] #15138: Unable to instantiate data members of kind Nat in backpack signatures.
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Thu Aug 2 03:44:25 UTC 2018
#15138: Unable to instantiate data members of kind Nat in backpack signatures.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ppk | Owner: (none)
Type: bug | Status: patch
Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.8.1
Component: Compiler | Version: 8.4.1
Resolution: | Keywords: backpack
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s): Phab:D4951
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ppk):
Replying to [comment:4 bgamari]:
> Unfortunately it doesn't look like this will quite make it. Sorry ppk!
That is okey. Thanks for all the effort you and the ghc team makes. But
here are some of the things about the failing test cases. I am documenting
it
here so that it can be useful for diagnosing them if this patch has to
eventually land.
1. The failing tests are all in the backpack tests should_fail section
namely bkpfail23,25,26,27 and 46
2. Of these all except `bkpfail46` is still giving compilation error which
but the stderr are not matching. As a result the most interesting test
is `bkpfail46`
as that is a case that was rejected before the patch which is getting
accepted now.
So we should really understand bkpfail46 to make sense whether it is
i. Making backpack more general (a good thing). This just means that
the
test case is no more relevant and could just be removed or ignored.
ii. Or this could be a break in typesafety and hence bad.
I do not think I understand the issues there fully to make a comment on
it one way
or the other.
3. The next critical test is the bkpfail25 as it gives an error message of
the form
{{{
bkpfail25.bkp:7:18: error:
_ The type synonym _T_ should have 1 argument, but has been given none
_ In the instance declaration for _Functor T_
}}}
There is a comment `bkpfail25.bkp` that precisely says that such an
error message
is "too late". So this too looks like a test case that needs some
analysis.
4. The other tests that fails, I do not have much to say.
I wanted to say that I also have a dependent phab which builds on this to
fix #15379 where I did document this. These tests were failing on my
machine and I was thinking that it could be some
change that I introduced in that patch which made the difference. Now it
looks like this is a problem
even here.
In summary, this looks like a test that requires some serious thought from
someone who understands
the backpack system much more than me.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/15138#comment:5>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list