[GHC] #5553: sendWakeup error in simple test program with MVars and killThread
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Fri Sep 1 19:11:03 UTC 2017
#5553: sendWakeup error in simple test program with MVars and killThread
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: bit | Owner: (none)
Type: bug | Status: closed
Priority: high | Milestone: 8.2.2
Component: Runtime System | Version: 8.0.1
Resolution: fixed | Keywords:
Operating System: Linux | Architecture: x86
Type of failure: Incorrect result | Test Case:
at runtime |
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by dfeuer):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
I'm unable to reproduce this in 8.2.1. I think it may have been fixed by
d5cd505bc484edee3dbd5d41fb7a27c2e18d528d
{{{
Author: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss at gmail.com>
Date: Tue Jan 17 15:52:37 2017 -0500
event manager: Don't worry if attempt to wake dead manager fails
This fixes #12038, where the TimerManager would attempt to wake up a
manager that was already dead, resulting in setnumcapabilities001
occassionally failing during shutdown with unexpected output on
stderr.
I'm frankly still not entirely confident in this solution but perhaps
it
will help to get a few more eyes on this.
My hypothesis is that the TimerManager is racing:
thread TimerManager worker
------- --------------------
requests that thread
manager shuts down
begins to clean up,
closing eventfd
calls wakeManager,
which tries to write
to closed eventfd
To prevent this `wakeManager` will need to synchronize with the
TimerManger worker to ensure that the worker doesn't clean up the
`Control` while another thread is trying to send a wakeup. However,
this
would add a bit of overhead on every timer interaction, which feels
rather costly for what is really a problem only at shutdown.
Moreover,
it seems that the event manager (e.g. `GHC.Event.Manager`) is also
afflicted by a similar race.
This patch instead simply tries to catch the write failure after it
has
happened and silence it in the case that the fd has vanished. It feels
rather hacky but it seems to work.
Test Plan: Run `setnumcapabilities001` repeatedly
Reviewers: hvr, austin, simonmar
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2957
GHC Trac Issues: #12038
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5553#comment:14>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list