[GHC] #14332: Deriving clauses can have forall types
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Mon Oct 9 16:32:44 UTC 2017
#14332: Deriving clauses can have forall types
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: RyanGlScott | Owner: (none)
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 8.2.1
checker) |
Resolution: | Keywords: deriving
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
Type of failure: GHC accepts | Unknown/Multiple
invalid program | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by goldfire):
In both of your examples, IIUC, the unification happens to the datatype
variables, not the newly-quantified variables in the `deriving` clause. I
agree that this kind unification is good. I further agree that any
unwritten kinds in a `deriving` clause should be unified. But I think any
explicitly written kinds are skolems, and that this doesn't cause
problems.
The example toward the end of comment:8 should be rejected; the user
should have to write `Type`, not `k`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14332#comment:9>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list