[GHC] #13944: Introduce synchronized FFI
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Wed Jul 12 19:01:33 UTC 2017
#13944: Introduce synchronized FFI
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: winter | Owner: (none)
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.4.1
Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by bgamari):
> Yes, i mean all the thread pause stuff. I want to understand what is the
minimum preparation before we can make FFI calls which doesn't get in GC's
way. I believe this helps to reduce GC pause.
I don't believe there is anything that we do currently that can simply be
omitted without careful consideration at very least.
Have you confirmed that `safe` is really as slow as you think it is? I
think that we should better characterise the problem before we begin
discussing possible solutions. I think it would be helpful if you had a
benchmark and could use it answer a few questions,
a. What overhead is incurred by a `unsafe` call?
b. What overhead is incurred by a `safe` call?
c. Where specifically is the additional overhead of the `safe` call
coming from?
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/13944#comment:10>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list