[GHC] #13077: Worker/wrapper can break the let-app invariant
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Wed Feb 8 17:28:31 UTC 2017
#13077: Worker/wrapper can break the let-app invariant
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: simonpj | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1
Resolution: fixed | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
| stranal/should_compile/T13077,
| T13077a
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by simonpj):
* status: new => closed
* testcase: => stranal/should_compile/T13077, T13077a
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
Fixed by
{{{
commit 596dece7866006d699969f775fd97bd306aad85b
Author: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>
Date: Fri Jan 13 08:56:53 2017 +0000
Record evaluated-ness on workers and wrappers
Summary:
This patch is a refinement of the original commit (which
was reverted):
commit 6b976eb89fe72827f226506d16d3721ba4e28bab
Date: Fri Jan 13 08:56:53 2017 +0000
Record evaluated-ness on workers and wrappers
In Trac #13027, comment:20, I noticed that wrappers created after
demand analysis weren't recording the evaluated-ness of strict
constructor arguments. In the ticket that led to a (debatable)
Lint error but in general the more we know about evaluated-ness
the better we can optimise.
This commit adds that info
* both in the worker (on args)
* and in the wrapper (on CPR result patterns).
See Note [Record evaluated-ness in worker/wrapper] in WwLib
On the way I defined Id.setCaseBndrEvald, and used it to shorten
the code in a few other places
Then I added test T13077a to test the CPR aspect of this patch,
but I found that Lint failed!
Reason: simpleOptExpr was discarding evaluated-ness info on
lambda binders because zapFragileIdInfo was discarding an
Unfolding of (OtherCon _). But actually that's a robust
unfolding; there is no need to discard it. To fix this:
* zapFragileIdInfo only zaps fragile unfoldings
* Replace isClosedUnfolding with isFragileUnfolding (the latter
is just the negation of the former, but the nomenclature is
more consistent). Better documentation too
Note [Fragile unfoldings]
* And Simplify.simplLamBndr can now look at isFragileUnfolding
to decide whether to use the longer route of simplUnfolding.
For some reason perf/compiler/T9233 improves in compile-time
allocation by 10%. Hooray
Nofib: essentially no change:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program Size Allocs Runtime Elapsed TotalMem
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cacheprof +0.0% -0.3% +0.9% +0.4% +0.0%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Min +0.0% -0.3% -2.4% -2.4% +0.0%
Max +0.0% +0.0% +9.8% +11.4% +2.4%
Geometric Mean +0.0% -0.0% +1.1% +1.0% +0.0%
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/13077#comment:2>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list