[GHC] #14593: Allow deprecation notices for type and data constructors separately
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Sun Dec 17 16:57:40 UTC 2017
#14593: Allow deprecation notices for type and data constructors separately
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: parsonsmatt | Owner: (none)
Type: feature | Status: new
request |
Priority: low | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 8.2.1
Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple
Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown
Unknown/Multiple |
Test Case: | Blocked By:
Blocking: | Related Tickets:
Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
The
[https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/8.2.2/docs/html/users_guide/glasgow_exts.html
#warning-and-deprecated-pragmas syntax for deprecations] only allows you
to provide a single message for deprecations:
> You can only attach to entities declared at top level in the module
being compiled, and you can only use unqualified names in the list of
entities. A capitalised name, such as T refers to either the type
constructor T or the data constructor T, or both if both are in scope. If
both are in scope, there is currently no way to specify one without the
other (c.f. fixities Infix type constructors, classes, and type
variables).
It would be nice to provide separate messages in deprecations for type and
data constructors. As an example, I am making a breaking change to a
library, and I am providing deprecated shims for backwards-compatibility:
{{{
-- Old:
data SomeField rec where
SomeField :: EntityField rec field -> SomeField rec
-- New:
data UpdateCollision rec where
CopyField :: EntityField rec field -> UpdateCollision rec
CopyUnless :: -- etc...
type SomeField = UpdateCollision
{-# DEPRECATED SomeField "The SomeField type was renamed to
UpdateCollision." #-}
pattern SomeField :: EntityField record typ -> SomeField record
pattern SomeField x = CopyField x
{-# DEPRECATED SomeField "The constructor SomeField is deprecated. Use the
function copyField instead." #-}
}}}
The workaround is to provide a longer error message that combines the two.
This is less pleasant than having separate notices, because it makes it
less obvious for the client how to migrate.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14593>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list