[GHC] #4020: Please consider adding support for local type synonyms
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Thu Dec 14 23:10:40 UTC 2017
#4020: Please consider adding support for local type synonyms
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nr | Owner: (none)
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: low | Milestone:
Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 6.12.2
checker) |
Resolution: | Keywords: type synonym
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by AntC):
Replying to [comment:18 ezyang]:
> Yeah, local type synonyms are probably the least controversial
Thanks Edward, but I see no controversy. Only the usual questions about
what are the use cases/benefits? what does it provide that can't be
written now/only written clumsily? how does it work? what complications
does the user need to understand? what complications does the compiler
need to understand?
> of "make global things possible locally" proposals. There are pretty
clear semantics for how it works in all cases.
Then it should be easy for someone to write up a proposal on github. I've
seen plenty of "make global things possible locally" proposals. None of
them have given a coherent explanation for how the local thing is to
behave when something containing it or mentioning it or bound to it gets
exported globally. (For example with class instances; that's why Wadler
made them global despite his initial proposal making them let-bound.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4020#comment:20>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list