[GHC] #14562: IntRep vs WordRep
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Thu Dec 7 13:36:17 UTC 2017
#14562: IntRep vs WordRep
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: andrewthad | Owner: (none)
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 8.2.1
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by andrewthad:
Old description:
> Why do `Int#` and `Word#` have different runtime representations? By this
> I mean that:
>
> {{{#!hs
> Int# :: TYPE 'IntRep
> Word# :: TYPE 'WordRep
> }}}
>
> To my understanding, they are always the same size and always live in the
> same set of registers. The docs for unsafeCoerce# state that it can be
> used for:
>
> > Casting an unboxed type to another unboxed type of the same size (but
> not coercions between floating-point and integral types)
>
> The implies that a cast between `Int#` and `Word#` is acceptable. But if
> you're able to unsafeCoerce# between two types, shouldn't they be defined
> as having the same representation?
>
> What I'm suggesting is that it may be better to collapse `IntRep` and
> `WordRep` into a single representation (probably named `WordRep`). We
> would then get slightly more reusable code in some cases:
>
> {{{#!hs
>
> data WordList (x :: TYPE 'WordRep)
> = WordListCons x (WordList x)
> | WordListNil
>
> ints :: WordList Int#
> ints = WordListCons 5# (WordListCons 8# WordListNil)
>
> words :: WordList Word#
> words = WordListCons 4## (WordListCons 12## WordListNil)
>
> mapWordList :: forall (x :: TYPE 'WordRep). (x -> x) -> WordList x ->
> WordList x
> mapWordList _ WordListNil = WordListNil
> mapWordList f (WordListCons x xs) = WordListCons (f x) xs
>
> biggerInts :: WordList Int#
> biggerInts = mapWordList (\x -> x +# 3) ints
>
> biggerWords :: WordList Int#
> biggerWords = mapWordList (\x -> plusWord# x 3) ints
> }}}
New description:
Why do `Int#` and `Word#` have different runtime representations? By this
I mean that:
{{{#!hs
Int# :: TYPE 'IntRep
Word# :: TYPE 'WordRep
}}}
To my understanding, they are always the same size and always live in the
same set of registers. The docs for unsafeCoerce# state that it can be
used for:
> Casting an unboxed type to another unboxed type of the same size (but
not coercions between floating-point and integral types)
The implies that a cast between `Int#` and `Word#` is acceptable. But if
you're able to unsafeCoerce# between two types, shouldn't they be defined
as having the same representation?
What I'm suggesting is that it may be better to collapse `IntRep` and
`WordRep` into a single representation (probably named `WordRep`). We
would then get slightly more reusable code in some cases:
{{{#!hs
data WordList (x :: TYPE 'WordRep)
= WordListCons x (WordList x)
| WordListNil
ints :: WordList Int#
ints = WordListCons 5# (WordListCons 8# WordListNil)
words :: WordList Word#
words = WordListCons 4## (WordListCons 12## WordListNil)
mapWordList :: forall (x :: TYPE 'WordRep). (x -> x) -> WordList x ->
WordList x
mapWordList _ WordListNil = WordListNil
mapWordList f (WordListCons x xs) = WordListCons (f x) xs
biggerInts :: WordList Int#
biggerInts = mapWordList (\x -> x +# 3) ints
biggerWords :: WordList Int#
biggerWords = mapWordList (\x -> plusWord# x 3) ints
}}}
For additional context, I'd add that, excluding `SumRep` and `TupleRep`
(because you can produce different nestings with equivalent
representations), coercions between types of different representations are
always unsound.
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14562#comment:1>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list