[GHC] #11186: Give strong preference to type variable names in scope when reporting hole contexts
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Fri Oct 21 17:10:44 UTC 2016
#11186: Give strong preference to type variable names in scope when reporting hole
contexts
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dfeuer | Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 7.10.2
checker) |
Resolution: | Keywords: typed-holes
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dfeuer):
Replying to [comment:5 simonpj]:
> And indeed, the same skolem bound in the pattern might have different
lexical names in different places:
> {{{
> bla2 (Foop q) = ( (\(r::pah) -> length ([r] :: _x)) q
> , (\(r::hap) -> length ([r] :: _y)) q )
> }}}
> Now what would you expect?
I would expect the report about `_x` to tell me about `pah` and the one
about `_y` to tell me about `hap`. May I ask what you think will be hard
about this?
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11186#comment:7>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list