[GHC] #12666: ApplicativeDo fails to sequence actions
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Thu Oct 6 00:54:43 UTC 2016
#12666: ApplicativeDo fails to sequence actions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: bgamari | Owner: simonmar
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.0.2
Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 8.0.1
checker) |
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by bgamari:
@@ -37,1 +37,1 @@
- catch this the fact that the result of the first `action` is unbound and
+ catch the fact that the result of the first `action` is not bound and
New description:
Consider the following,
{{{#!hs
{-# LANGUAGE ApplicativeDo #-}
module Fail where
data P a = P
instance Functor (P) where
fmap _ P = P
instance Applicative (P) where
P <*> P = P
pure _ = P
action :: P Int
action = P
works :: P (Int, Int)
works = do
a <- action
b <- action
return (a,b)
thisWorks :: P Int
thisWorks = action *> action
-- It seems like this should be equivalent to thisWorks.
shouldThisWork :: P Int
shouldThisWork = do
action
action
}}}
It seems to me that `thisWorks` and `shouldThisWork` are equivalent, yet
the latter fails to typecheck. It seems that `ApplicativeDo` fails to
catch the fact that the result of the first `action` is not bound and
therefore can be sequenced with `*>`.
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12666#comment:2>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list