[GHC] #12814: Should GND infer an instance context when deriving method-free classes?
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Mon Nov 7 22:18:44 UTC 2016
#12814: Should GND infer an instance context when deriving method-free classes?
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: RyanGlScott | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 8.2.1
Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 8.0.1
checker) |
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: #11369, #12810 | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by RyanGlScott):
Replying to [comment:2 goldfire]:
> Frankly, I was surprised that GND assumes any class constraint at all.
Why should it be different than other forms of `deriving`? Just infer the
class constraint based on the constraints that arise when type-checking
the generated definition.
I'm not sure how the thing you're imagining is different from what
actually happens. GND must infer a constraint (applied to the
representation type for the newtype) in order to typecheck any calls to
`coerce` that GND generates. This is quite similar to stock deriving. For
example, in:
{{{#!hs
data Foo a b = Foo b
deriving Show
}}}
You must infer `Show b` in order to typecheck the generated `showsPrec`
function.
The only difference in this scenario is that there are no stock derivable
classes without methods, but with GND, such a thing is possible. So it's
quite a different beast.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12814#comment:3>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list