[GHC] #8809: Prettier error messages?
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Wed Mar 30 04:32:08 UTC 2016
#8809: Prettier error messages?
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: joelteon | Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 7.9
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
#8809,#10073,#10179 |
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by niteria):
I've run into this while trying to hack together something like
http://gcc.godbolt.org/, but for Haskell, with Core, Stg, Cmm and Asm
output.
With `-g` all the location data is already nicely tracked all the way to
Asm and the only piece missing is a way to pretty print with some
annotations about the ranges.
I took a stab at adding a parameter to `Doc`, but I haven't gone through
with it because
[https://phabricator.haskell.org/diffusion/GHC/browse/master/compiler/main/ErrUtils.hs;eb6b7094c80fda5cc7c1d1ed3386486996f24bff$75-132
some other types] use it transitively and I couldn't decide between `SDoc
a` and `SDoc Void` there.
[http://hackage.haskell.org/package/pretty-1.1.3.2/docs/Text-PrettyPrint-
Annotated.html pretty] appears to be the same library GHC uses and as
pointed out by bgamari already supports annotations. Does anyone know if
they diverged in functionality/semantics? If not, would it be a useful
step to migrate GHC's `Doc` to annotated version?
I think an argument against it is that it doesn't have a `Monad` instance,
but I don't immediately see the benefit of having it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8809#comment:19>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list