[GHC] #12191: 7% allocation regression in Haddock performance tests

[GHC]

#12191: 7% allocation regression in Haddock performance tests
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
        Reporter:  bgamari           |                Owner:
            Type:  task              |               Status:  new
        Priority:  normal            |            Milestone:
       Component:  Compiler          |              Version:  8.0.1
      Resolution:                    |             Keywords:
Operating System:  Unknown/Multiple  |         Architecture:
 Type of failure:  Compile-time      |  Unknown/Multiple
  performance bug                    |            Test Case:
      Blocked By:                    |             Blocking:
 Related Tickets:  #10482            |  Differential Rev(s):
       Wiki Page:                    |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by thomie):

 * related:   => #10482


Comment:

 How about we just delete those 3 haddock performance tests?

 From https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2015-July/009434.html:

 >> Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
 >> Could it be creeping up because Haddock is doing more than before?
 >> Ie not just because GHC is being bad?
 > Yes, it very much could be. Haddock is a moving target so it's not too
 > weird that the numbers change. I want to say that the perf test should
 > just be removed but it's still useful: if you're GHC hacking and not
 > changing Haddock and numbers go awry then it serves its purpose.

--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12191#comment:2>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler