[GHC] #12143: ApplicativeDo Fails to Desugar 'return True'
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Wed Jun 1 23:57:11 UTC 2016
#12143: ApplicativeDo Fails to Desugar 'return True'
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: MichaelBurge | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1
Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple
Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown
Unknown/Multiple |
Test Case: | Blocked By:
Blocking: | Related Tickets:
Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
If I bring in a spurious parameter, ApplicativeDo correctly infers
Functor.
{{{
Prelude> :t \m -> do { x <- m; return True; }
\m -> do { x <- m; return True; } :: Functor f => f t -> f Bool
Prelude> :t \m -> do { m; return True; }
\m -> do { m; return True; } :: Monad m => m a -> m Bool
}}}
However, without the spurious parameter, ApplicativeDo assumes monad.
{{{
Prelude> :t do { return True; }
do { return True; } :: Monad m => m Bool
}}}
The first block in particular shows two examples that seem inconsistent
when placed next to each other. It seems like if 'x' is unused, then 'x <-
m' and 'm' should be equivalent.
I would expect all of these to desugar to Functor or Applicative. And
maybe 'return True' should be Monad, but 'do { return True; }' should be
Applicative?
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12143>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list