[GHC] #12441: Conflicting definitions error does not print explicit quantifiers when necessary
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Tue Jul 26 22:21:50 UTC 2016
#12441: Conflicting definitions error does not print explicit quantifiers when
necessary
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ezyang | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 8.0.1
(Type checker) |
Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple
Architecture: | Type of failure: None/Unknown
Unknown/Multiple |
Test Case: | Blocked By:
Blocking: | Related Tickets:
Differential Rev(s): | Wiki Page:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
{{{
-- Y.hs-boot
{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-}
module Y where
f :: forall a b. (a, b)
-- YY.hs
module YY where
import {-# SOURCE #-} Y
-- Y.hs
{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-}
module Y where
import YY
f :: forall b a. (a, b)
f = undefined
}}}
I get the following unhelpful error:
{{{
ezyang at sabre:~$ ghc-8.0 --make Y.hs -fforce-recomp
[1 of 3] Compiling Y[boot] ( Y.hs-boot, Y.o-boot )
[2 of 3] Compiling YY ( YY.hs, YY.o )
[3 of 3] Compiling Y ( Y.hs, Y.o )
Y.hs-boot:3:1: error:
Identifier âfâ has conflicting definitions in the module
and its hs-boot file
Main module: f :: (a, b)
Boot file: f :: (a, b)
The two types are different
}}}
Yes this example is purposely shooting itself in the foot, but in the wild
I encountered an un-annotated type which inferred a different quantifier
ordering than what I expected, and I subsequently spent a while puzzling
over the error message. `-fprint-explicit-foralls` is a sufficient
workaround.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12441>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list