[GHC] #10843: Allow do blocks without dollar signs as arguments
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Fri Jul 8 09:47:52 UTC 2016
#10843: Allow do blocks without dollar signs as arguments
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: agibiansky | Owner: agibiansky
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.2
(Parser) |
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: #11706 | Differential Rev(s): Phab:D1219
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by maeder):
Replying to [comment:27 goldfire]:
> Replying to [comment:22 simonpj]:
> > I'm one of those who thinks that the fact that `f R { x = e }` means
`f (R { x = e })` is a mistake :-).
> >
>
> I agree with you here, but I think the proposal in this ticket is still
sensible, given that the perhaps-unexpected parsing started with a
keyword. In the record update case, the perhaps-unexpected parsing isn't
known until the open-brace, even though your brain has to parse the
preceding space differently. To me, that's the real problem with the
parsing of record-update: it's not left-to-right.
I fully agree, too! The record syntax is unrelated to this proposal. Curly
record braces are sort of a strong binding postfix operator and are thus
different from plain parentheses.
@aiko I would omit the point "This would make do blocks consistent with
record creation ..." under Pros on
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ArgumentDo. Record creation is only
another kind of a more "non-atomic" aexp in the grammar.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10843#comment:28>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list