[GHC] #11418: Suggest correct spelling when module is not found because of typo
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Mon Jan 18 17:21:15 UTC 2016
#11418: Suggest correct spelling when module is not found because of typo
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: syd | Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: lowest | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by thomie):
> I, for example, use makefiles during development instead of cabal
because it allows for a faster code/compile/fix type errors cycle.
Just curious: wouldn't `cabal repl` be faster? Or adding `ghc-options:
-O0` to your `.cabal` file?
If you want to proceed with the scanning the filesystem plan, I think it
is best create a small wiki page, with a specification. See
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/WorkingConventions/AddingFeatures.
Basically copy what you wrote in comment:15 + clarifications from later
comments. That way it is easier to digest for others, so they don't have
to read through all these comments.
Paste a link here, and send it to glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org,
requesting feedback. Hammering the file system might be frowned upon by
some, so make sure you explain the flag (name to be decided by you) is off
by default. In case you don't get any reactions, go to #ghc on the
freenode irc channel, and ask bgamari (ghc maintainer) if he thinks it is
ok to implement this. Then do it and submit a patch.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11418#comment:20>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list